Guy Simpson: Painting the Places We Leave Behind
Guy Simpson's paintings begin with things most people overlook: a wall socket, a strip of parquet flooring, a set of blinds, a crack in plaster, a school chair left behind in an empty room. He has built his practice around these ordinary details, turning them into records of place, memory and change.
Born in Johannesburg in 1994 and now based in Cape Town, Simpson has developed quickly since his first solo exhibition at THK Gallery. He has since exhibited with Everard Read and Goodman Gallery, while his work has traveled beyond South Africa through exhibitions and art fairs. In 2025, his solo booth with Untitled Art at Latitudes Art Fair won the Lexus Best Stand award. His growing visibility reflects an artist whose work has become increasingly difficult to classify: part painting, part sculpture, part architectural record.
But the speed of his career is less interesting than the direction of his practice. Simpson is moving away from simply depicting rooms and objects and towards constructing paintings that behave like objects themselves. He has taken the domestic spaces of his childhood and transformed them into layered surfaces that sit somewhere between image, wall fragment and sculpture.
From drawing rooms to dismantling them
Simpson's earliest works were tightly observed drawings of interiors. His interest came from his childhood home in Sydenham, Johannesburg, where he lived from the age of six until he left for the Cape Town Creative Academy at 19.
The house provided a vocabulary that would shape his early practice: plug points, light switches, alarm sensors, skirting boards, parquet floors and brass numbers. These were not dramatic subjects, but Simpson treated them with the seriousness usually reserved for portraits or landscapes.
THK Gallery's account of his early practice describes this attention to everyday objects as a way of identifying with a familiar domestic environment. He used wall paint, acrylic and graphite to reproduce worn surfaces and overlooked fixtures with a matter-of-fact precision.
The approach was deceptively simple. By isolating an ordinary object, Simpson made the viewer look at it differently. A wall socket became evidence of a particular room. A floor became evidence of the people who had walked across it. A damaged wall became a record of time.
That interest in surfaces eventually became more important than the objects themselves.
The wall as archive
The transition from descriptive painting to abstraction is central to understanding Simpson's work. His paintings increasingly resemble fragments removed from buildings rather than pictures of buildings.
This became especially clear in Over the Garden Wall, his 2024 exhibition at Breakroom Projects, the Woodstock project founded by artist Igshaan Adams. Simpson showed irregularly shaped paintings alongside a motorized gate and sculptural shoes. The paintings appeared scraped, layered and weathered, resembling sections of damaged walls that had somehow been detached from their original surroundings.
The installation changed the way his paintings functioned. They were no longer simply representations of architectural spaces. They occupied space themselves.
That distinction matters. Simpson's work asks viewers to consider where a painting ends, and an object begins. His surfaces suggest construction and erosion at the same time. He builds them up only to make them look as if they have been worn away.
The result is an unusual form of abstraction. It does not abandon the real world. Instead, it starts with something recognizable and gradually removes enough information for the viewer to become aware of texture, shape, material and memory.
Material becomes meaning
Simpson's current paintings are materially dense. He works with acrylic and wall paint, but he also incorporates materials such as wood dust, crafting sand, aluminum filings and micro-reflective glass beads. These materials give his paintings physical qualities that ordinary paint cannot achieve.
In Tuckshop Staircase (2025), for example, acrylic, wall paint and micro-reflective glass beads sit on layered canvas. Ramp to Primary School Field combines acrylic and wall paint with wood dust, crafting sand and aluminum filings. Bottom Corridor uses wood dust and reflective glass beads on layered and creased canvas.
These additions are not decorative. They imitate the physical character of the environments Simpson paints. Dust suggests construction or deterioration. Sand creates abrasion. Metal introduces a harder surface. Reflective material changes as the viewer moves.
The painting therefore becomes something to experience rather than observe.
Goodman Gallery has described Simpson's practice as existing at the intersection of documentation and abstraction. The description is useful because it explains why the works can feel both specific and elusive. A painting may originate from a particular staircase or corridor, but Simpson does not necessarily want the viewer to identify the location. He wants the physical sensation of the place to remain.
Johannesburg remains present
Although Simpson now lives and works in Cape Town, Johannesburg remains embedded in his practice.
His recent exhibition Was Here at Goodman Gallery, presented in Johannesburg in 2026, marked his first gallery presentation in the city where he grew up. The exhibition returned directly to the spaces of his childhood and schooling, particularly King David Victory Park, the Jewish day school he attended.
The exhibition began with photographs Simpson took of the school before its closure. He translated those photographs into paintings that record small details: synagogue seating, classroom boards, blinds, a mezuzah on a doorway, and other traces of institutional life.
The absence of people is important. Simpson does not need to paint a figure to suggest human presence. A chair implies the person who sat there. A handwritten mark suggests a child. A mezuzah indicates a religious community. A school corridor becomes a record of generations passing through it.
The title Was Here captures the central idea. These places existed as living environments, but their identities change as communities move, institutions close,e and buildings acquire new meanings.
Goodman Gallery connects Simpson's work to wider demographic changes in Johannesburg, particularly the shifting Jewish community in the suburbs where he grew up.
Simpson does not present these changes as simple loss. His own comment on cracked brick and peeling paint is telling: change can be visible without being ugly. His work accepts deterioration as part of a place's life rather than treating it only as evidence of decline.
Framing changed the work
One of the most important developments in Simpson's practice came from a practical problem. His larger, unstretched canvases were difficult to sell. Rather than treating that limitation as a setback, he began stretching and framing the works.
The decision changed what he could do with the medium.
A rigid support gave him a structure on which to build layers. It also allowed the paintings to move closer to sculpture. Instead of functioning as loose pieces of material, they could have a defined physical presence on the wall.
This is where Simpson's practice becomes particularly interesting. The frame usually separates a painting from its surroundings. Simpson uses it to emphasize the material relationship between the two. His paintings can resemble pieces of architecture, but the frame reminds us that we are still looking at constructed images.
That tension between containment and expansion runs throughout his recent work.
Sculpture, movement and the everyday
Simpson's practice also extends into sculpture. His shoes and architectural elements introduce movement into exhibitions that might otherwise remain static.
In Was Here, a trail of three pairs of sculptural shoes increases in size, suggesting passage through a place and the physical process of growing up. The objects turn the exhibition into something closer to a route than a collection of isolated paintings.
This connects to a recurring quality in Simpson's work: he is interested in what happens when people move through spaces.
A home is not simply a structure. A school is not simply a collection of rooms. Both become meaningful through repetition: walking through the same doorway, sitting in the same chair, taking the same route to class, touching the same wall.
His paintings slow these experiences down.
Why focus on Guy Simpson?
Simpson is worth watching because he demonstrates how contemporary painting can remain rooted in everyday experience without becoming literal.
His work does not depend on spectacular subjects. He finds significance in the spaces people pass through every day, and in the marks those spaces accumulate. That makes his practice particularly relevant to a South African context, where architecture can carry complicated histories of class, migration, religion, community and belonging.
He also represents an important shift in how painting can operate. His work begins with documentation but refuses to remain documentary. It moves from drawing into painting, from painting into material construction and from construction into sculpture.
That background matters because it places his commercial success within a broader culture of experimentation. Simpson did not emerge fully formed from the blue-chip gallery system. He developed through a network of artists, alternative spaces and collaborative projects before moving into larger institutional and commercial contexts.
His current position is therefore worth following closely. The question is no longer whether Simpson can paint a room accurately. He has already moved beyond that.
The more compelling question is what happens when he takes the memory of a room apart.
Walls become surfaces. Surfaces become paintings. Paintings become objects. Objects become traces of people who have moved through a place and left something behind.
Guy Simpson's work makes that process visible. He turns the ordinary into evidence and deterioration into material. In doing so, he shows that a place does not need to be famous to carry history. Sometimes all it takes is a cracked wall, an empty classroom, or a pair of shoes to tell us that someone was here.
Comments
Post a Comment