Paul Sekete: Between Township Memory, African Modernism and the Language of the Unspoken
Paul Sekete occupies an unusual and increasingly important place in South African art history. Born in Ficksburg in the Free State in 1957 and dying in 2010, he belonged to a generation of Black South African artists whose careers developed across the final decades of apartheid and the first years of democracy. Yet Sekete does not fit comfortably into the conventional categories used to describe South African art of that period. He was not simply a township artist, a political artist, a traditionalist, a modernist or a sculptor. His work moved between these categories, creating a visual language in which ordinary people, memory, ritual, landscape and mythology became deliberately difficult to separate.
Today, his work is held in significant institutional and private collections, including the Constitutional Court Art Collection, the University of Cape Town, the University of Fort Hare, Oliewenhuis Art Museum, the South African Department of Public Works and Ellerman House. His work has also continued to appear at auction, demonstrating that his reputation has survived well beyond his lifetime.
A childhood shaped by two visual traditions
Sekete's early environment is essential to understanding his later work. He grew up in the Free State in an area containing abundant examples of southern African rock paintings. At home, another visual tradition was present through the woven mats and pottery made by his grandmother and other family members. These were not necessarily "art" in the Western institutional sense, but they provided a visual vocabulary based on pattern, repetition, material, symbol and craft.
This distinction matters.
Sekete did not emerge from an established European-style art-school tradition. He was self-trained, and before becoming a professional artist, he spent a year working as a miner. He subsequently joined the Katlehong Art Center, an institution that would become critical to his artistic development.
The result was an artistic education that was both formal and informal. He encountered the contemporary art world through the Katlehong Art Center. Still, his deepest visual references could remain rooted in memory, African material culture, and the landscape in which he grew up.
This helps explain one of the most distinctive characteristics of his work: Sekete did not simply reproduce traditional African imagery. Instead, he transformed memories of African visual culture into something recognizably modern.
Katlehong and the politics of becoming an artist
Sekete's arrival at the Katlehong Art Center placed him inside one of the most important community-based artistic environments in apartheid-era South Africa.
The center emerged from the Katlehong Art Society and was formally established in 1977. Its origins went back to a group of township artists including Stanley Nkosi, Lucas Sithole, Napo Mokoena and Morningstar Motaung. It operated in a period marked by apartheid repression, political violence and limited access for Black South Africans to conventional art education.
Katlehong was therefore more than a place where Sekete could learn how to paint. It was part of a larger history of Black artists creating their own cultural infrastructure.
The center provided facilities for painting, drawing, ceramics, sculpture, weaving and other forms of artistic production. Younger artists were mentored there, while teachers included artists associated with institutions such as Rorke's Drift. Female artists, including Gladys Xaba and Mmakgabo Sebidi, also contributed to the artistic education taking place around the center.
This environment is important when considering Sekete's position in South African art history. His self-taught status should not be interpreted as artistic isolation. He belonged to a network of Black artists, community institutions, galleries and cultural workers who were developing alternative routes into the professional art world.
The Katlehong Art Center also had an unusually strong commercial orientation. Its organizers worked to get artists' work into galleries and exhibitions and to create markets for their work. Research into the center describes this as an important part of its contribution: it was not only concerned with artistic education but with helping artists make a living.
Sekete's later professional career, including exhibitions at Gallery 21 and Everard Read, can therefore be understood partly as an extension of this infrastructure.
From the township to a private visual mythology
Sekete's early mature work is frequently associated with what Everard Read describes as the "neon township". His figures appear to emerge from everyday urban life: people standing, walking, gesturing or simply occupying a shared space. Yet they rarely look anatomically naturalistic.
Bodies stretch. Heads become disproportionately large or small. Limbs lengthen. Figures appear to occupy a strange space between human beings, spirits, symbols and archetypes.
The distortion is fundamental to his work.
It is tempting to interpret distorted African figures as expressions of social suffering, but that interpretation is too narrow. Sekete's distortion is not simply an illustration of oppression. It is a method of seeing. The human body becomes something that can carry memory, emotion, ritual, and cultural identity simultaneously.
The Constitutional Court Art Collection makes a similar point when describing one of Sekete's works as an experimental treatment of the human form that challenges the expectation that people should be represented realistically. Its description specifically identifies distortion, elongation, disproportionate scale, and earthy tones as central to his approach.
This is one reason Sekete stands apart from straightforward social realism.
Artists such as Gerard Sekoto and George Pemba are rightly remembered for the importance of social realism in South African art. Their work gave visible form to Black urban life and community. Sekoto inherited the importance of everyday African experience, but he pushed it somewhere stranger. Rather than simply documenting the township, he transformed it into a psychological and symbolic landscape. Contemporary South African art discourse continues to distinguish the social-realist tradition of Pemba and Sekoto as a major strand of twentieth-century Black South African painting.
The influence of rock art
Everard Read identifies rock art as an important influence on his visual language, particularly in his use of elongated figures, distortion, and strong linear forms. After Sekete moved from Johannesburg to Cape Town in 1999, his palette reportedly became more earthy and rustic, and his imagery increasingly drew upon the suggestive and mythic qualities associated with KhoiSan art.
But this should not be reduced to the idea that Sekete was simply copying ancient rock paintings.
His achievement was to create a dialogue between ancient and modern visual languages.
A figure that might recall a prehistoric rock painting can exist beside references to the township, modern life, or imagined creatures. The result is neither archaeological reconstruction nor conventional contemporary painting. It is a form of cultural memory.
In Sekete's hands, the past is not presented as something dead. It becomes an active presence inside contemporary South African identity.
The medium was part of the message.
Sekete's versatility across media is another reason he deserves greater attention.
He worked in oil and acrylic, but also produced linocuts, woodcuts, clay sculpture and wood sculpture. Some of his sculptures were subsequently cast in bronze at Guy du Toit's studio in Pretoria. His first solo exhibition in 1990 at Gallery 21 in Johannesburg included terracotta and bronze sculpture.
This movement between media mirrors the movement between cultural references in his work.
Oil and acrylic allowed him to construct atmospheric worlds. Printmaking reduced imagery to line, shape and graphic structure. Clay connected his practice to the physical traditions of African pottery and sculpture. Wood introduced another organic material, while bronze transformed selected figures into objects with a more permanent sculptural presence.
A 1995 Group of Figures, for example, was executed in oil on canvas, while later auction records demonstrate the breadth of his sculptural practice through works such as Tall Figure, cast in bronze. A mixed-media work, Untitled XX, sold at Strauss & Co in 2026 for R18,620, while a bronze Tall Figure achieved R36,378 in 2017.
These results should not be mistaken for a definitive measure of artistic importance, but they do show continuing collector interest.
What was Sekete actually saying?
Perhaps the most revealing comment attributed to Sekete comes from American writer Andrew Solomon, who met the artist while writing about South African art.
The remark is revealing because Sekete resisted the expectation that Black South African art should primarily function as political testimony.
This does not mean that his art was apolitical.
His work emerged from apartheid South Africa, from township life, from cultural displacement and from the complicated process of negotiating African identity within a racially divided society. But Sekoto's response was not to turn every painting into an explicit political statement.
Instead, he made room for mystery.
Elizabeth Larkin, writing for Everard Read, described his paintings as containing "puzzling narratives" with references to daily life, ritual and customs. That description gets close to the central quality of Sekete's art: the works seem to tell stories, but refuse to tell the viewer exactly what those stories mean.
His figures might be people, ancestors, dream figures, or memories. A tree may be a tree, or it may be part of a symbolic landscape. An animal may be observed reality or something mythological.
Sekete deliberately leaves space for the viewer.
A changing South Africa inside the work
Sekete's career also coincided with an extraordinary historical transition.
His first solo exhibition took place in 1990, the same year Nelson Mandela was released and the political order that had defined South Africa for decades began to change. He later participated in the 2004 exhibition 10 Exhibitions – 10 Years of Democracy at Everard Read.
His work therefore spans the threshold between apartheid and democratic South Africa.
Yet his paintings do not need to be read simply as political documents of that transition.
His move from Johannesburg to Cape Town in 1999 appears to have contributed to a significant change in his visual language. Everard Read describes a movement away from the brighter "neon township" imagery toward a more rustic palette and a mysterious language influenced by the Free State and southern African visual traditions.
This development suggests an artist becoming increasingly interested in memory and identity rather than simply place.
Where does Paul Sekete belong in South African art history?
Sekete belongs within the history of Black South African modernism, but he complicates that history.
He stands alongside the generations of artists who made the township a legitimate subject of serious art, while simultaneously moving beyond documentary representation. He belongs to the community-art-center tradition represented by Katlehong, yet his mature work moved into a highly personal symbolic language. And he belongs to the post-apartheid art landscape without becoming an artist whose significance depends solely on the politics of apartheid.
That makes his work particularly valuable today.
South African art history has often been organized around major figures and movements: modernism, social realism, resistance art, the Black Consciousness era, community art centers and post-apartheid conceptualism. Sekete cuts across these categories.
His importance lies partly in refusing to choose between them.
What makes Paul Sekete stand out?
Ultimately, Sekete's originality comes from the combination of things that might initially appear contradictory.
He was self-taught but became professionally represented. He worked from township experience but increasingly incorporated rural and ancient visual references. He used traditional materials such as clay and wood alongside oil, acrylic and bronze. His figures were recognizably African but were never straightforwardly naturalistic. His work could be joyful without being naïve, mysterious without becoming inaccessible, and culturally specific without becoming merely illustrative.
His institutional presence confirms that this was not simply an artist admired during his lifetime. Sekete's works remain in major South African collections, including the Constitutional Court, and continue to circulate through the secondary market. Everard Read continues to represent and exhibit his work, while Strauss & Co continues to bring his paintings and sculptures before collectors.
There is also an important historical caution.
There is currently little reliable published evidence to identify a group of younger artists who can be described specifically as Sekete's direct artistic disciples. It would therefore be misleading to claim that particular contemporary artists were "influenced by Paul Sekete" without documentary evidence. His influence is better understood at the level of South African visual culture: he demonstrated how African memory, township experience, rock-art aesthetics, sculpture and modern painting could occupy the same artistic language.
That may ultimately prove to be the more important legacy.
Paul Sekete did not simply paint South Africa as it looked. He painted South Africa as it was remembered, imagined and experienced.
His elongated figures seem to stand between worlds: between town and country, past and present, ordinary life and ritual, realism and mythology. They are recognizably human but deliberately refuse to remain ordinary bodies.
That is why Sekete's work continues to reward close looking.
The figures do not give everything away.
They invite the viewer to complete the story.
Comments
Post a Comment